WATCH · Software Delivery_
How to Evaluate Code Quality When You’re Not Technical
Saleem Beg · Founder, Teque
● 1:52 · Posted 4 months ago
KEY TAKEAWAYS_
- Ask about testing — "we'll test it manually" is a red flag
- Request architecture explanation in plain English
- Get an independent code review (few hundred pounds, could save tens of thousands)
- Watch how they handle questions — good partners educate, bad partners obfuscate
TRANSCRIPT_
How do you know if code is actually good when you're not technical yourself? This is the question that haunts every non-technical founder. You trusting someone with your money, your vision, and you have no way to verify if what they're building is solid or a house of cards. Here's the uncomfortable truth.
You can't fully evaluate code quality without technical knowledge, but you can look for signals that separate professionals from amateurs. First, ask about testing. Good developers write automated tests. If they say, "Well, we will test it manually or look confused when you mention testing," that's a red flag straight away. Ask them, "What percentage of your code has automated
tests?" Second, ask to see their documentation. Can they explain their architecture to you in plain English? If they can't explain it, simply they either don't understand it themselves or they're hiding complexity that will bite you later. Third, request a code review from an independent third party. This costs a few hundred pounds and could save you tens of thousands. Any
reputable agency will welcome this because they're proud of their work. The ones who resist, ask yourself why. Fourth, watch how they handle questions. Do they get defensive when you probe? Do they dismiss your concerns as too technical for you to understand? Good partners educate. Bad partners obfiscate. You don't need to become a developer. You need to become a better
judge of developers.
“You don't need to become a developer. You need to become a better judge of developers.”
Prefer to read? This take is also a written article.
Read the article →


